Predicting career aspirations and university majors from academic ability and self-concept: A longitudinal application of the Internal-External frame of reference model
Interne und externe Referenzrahmen als Prädiktoren von Laufbahnerwartungen und von Schwerpunkten der Universitätsabschlüsse
Beitrag in Sammelwerk › Forschung
Publikationsdaten
| Von | Philip Parker, Gabriel Nagy, Ulrich Trautwein, Oliver Lüdtke |
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
| Erschienen in | Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Ingrid Schoon (Hrsg.), Gender Differences in Aspirations and Attainment: A Life Course Perspective |
| Seiten | 224-246 |
| Herausgeber (Verlag) | Cambridge University Press |
| ISBN | 978-1-107645196, 978-1-107021723, 978-1-139128933 |
| DOI/Link | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139128933.015 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht – 10.2014 |
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics university majors are critical pathways toward prestigious careers, yet women are still underrepresented in many of these domains. In this chapter, we review the role that self-beliefs play in the development of educational aspirations and attempts to realize those aspirations at the end of secondary school. In particular, we use the internal/external frame of reference model to explore the potential of achievement and self-concept profiles as predictors of university major aspirations and attainment as one possible explanation for gender differences in these domains. After reviewing previous research in this area, we provide a research example using a large longitudinal database from Germany (N = 1,881). Results suggest that (a) high math achievement and self-concept predicted math-intensive university major choice and lower likelihood of entering verbal-intensive majors (and vice versa); (b) there appeared to be a continuum of university majors such that strong mathematics achievement and self-concept profiles predicted entry into hard sciences, while the opposite profile predicted entry into the humanities with biology and medicine displaying more mixed patterns; and (c) after controlling for achievement and self-concept there were still important gender differences in university majors. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.