Myths about teaching and learning organic chemistry

Artikel in FachzeitschriftForschungbegutachtet

Publikationsdaten


VonNicole Graulich, Molly Atkinson, Sascha Bernholt, Gautam Bhattacharyya, Scott E. Lewis, Maia Popova, Ginger V. Shultz, Ryan Stowe, Benjamin Pölloth
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Erschienen inJournal of Chemical Education, 103(3)
Seiten1145-1158
Herausgeber (Verlag)American Chemical Society
ISSN0021-9584, 1938-1328
DOI/Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01507 (Open Access)
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht – 03.2026

This Perspective brings to light and challenges a set of persistent myths that seem to subtly influence the teaching and learning of organic chemistry. We have chosen nine myths that reflect common beliefs, which may have arisen from historically established teaching methods, systemic reasons for content coverage, large class sizes, expert “blind spots”, and/or personal instructional preferences. These myths may prevent students from meaningful learning and can inadvertently promote superficial memorization over a deeper understanding of concepts and reaction mechanisms. For each myth, we examine its origin and outline insights and design principles informed by empirical research in chemistry education, highlighting practical approaches that bridge the gap between theory and practice. The overall aim is to raise awareness of persistent myths and encourage efforts to replace them with strategies that foster conceptual understanding, mechanistic reasoning, and more meaningful engagement with organic chemistry.