An explanatory mixture IRT model for careless and insufficient effort responding in self-report measures
Artikel in Fachzeitschrift › Forschung › begutachtet
Publikationsdaten
| Von | Esther Ulitzsch, Seyma Nur Yildirim-Erbasli, Güher Görgün, Okan Bulut |
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
| Erschienen in | British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 75(3) |
| Seiten | 668-698 |
| Herausgeber (Verlag) | Wiley |
| ISSN | 0007-1102, 2044-8317 |
| DOI/Link | https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12272 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht – 11.2022 |
Careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER) on self-report measures results in responses that do not reflect the trait to be measured, thereby posing a major threat to the quality of survey data. Reliable approaches for detecting C/IER aid in increasing the validity of inferences being made from survey data. First, once detected, C/IER can be taken into account in data analysis. Second, approaches for detecting C/IER support a better understanding of its occurrence, which facilitates designing surveys that curb the prevalence of C/IER. Previous approaches for detecting C/IER are limited in that they identify C/IER at the aggregate respondent or scale level, thereby hindering investigations of item characteristics evoking C/IER. We propose an explanatory mixture item response theory model that supports identifying and modelling C/IER at the respondent-by-item level, can detect a wide array of C/IER patterns, and facilitates a deeper understanding of item characteristics associated with its occurrence. As the approach only requires raw response data, it is applicable to data from paper-and-pencil and online surveys. The model shows good parameter recovery and can well handle the simultaneous occurrence of multiple types of C/IER patterns in simulated data. The approach is illustrated on a publicly available Big Five inventory data set, where we found later item positions to be associated with higher C/IER probabilities. We gathered initial supporting validity evidence for the proposed approach by investigating agreement with multiple commonly employed indicators of C/IER.