Static and dynamic visual representations: Individual differences in processing
Contribution to collected edition/anthology › Research › Peer reviewed
Publication data
By | Tim Höffler, Annett Schmeck, Maria Opfermann |
Original language | English |
Published in | Gregory Schraw, Matthew T. McCrudden, Daniel Robinson (Eds.), Learning through visual displays. (Current Perspectives on Cognition, Learning, and Instruction) |
Pages | 133-163 |
Editor (Publisher) | Information Age Publishing |
ISBN | 9781623962333, 9781623962357 |
DOI/Link | http://lccn.loc.gov/2013004595 , http://www.infoagepub.com/products/Learning-Through-Visual-Displays |
Publication status | Published – 07.2013 |
The benefits of visual representations that are added to (written or spoken)
words to enhance learning are beyond doubt and have been well-established
throughout educational research in the last two decades. In this regard, the
preceding chapters have introduced and discussed the cognitive foundations
for learning with different kinds of visual representations and the ways
they can be used throughout different learning scenarios. This chapter adds
another aspect to this overall view by addressing when and why dynamic
representations are beneficial for learning and whether they are in any way
superior to static pictures. Moreover, we focus on whether such learning
effects differ with respect to different conditions as well as different learner
characteristics, such as prior knowledge, cognitive style and spatial ability.
We conclude that different visual representations may be more useful in specific
situations; however, using any visual representation is preferable to
none at all.