Probing the amalgam: The relationship between science teachers’
content, pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge

Journal articleResearchPeer reviewed

Publication data


ByKnut Neumann, Vanessa Kind, Ute Harms
Original languageEnglish
Published inInternational Journal of Science Education, 41(7)
Pages847-861
Editor (Publisher)Taylor and Francis Ltd.
ISSN0950-0693, 1464-5289
DOI/Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1497217 (Open Access)
Publication statusPublished – 05.2019

This Special Issue aims to present evidence about the relationships between content knowledge (CK), pedagogical knowledge (PK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK); the development of these types of knowledge in novice and experienced secondary science teachers; and how CK, PK and/or PCK impact students’ learning. Since Shulman’s introduction of PCK as the feature that distinguishes the teacher from the content expert, researchers have attempted to understand, delineate, assess and/or develop the construct in pre- and in-service teachers. Accordingly, empirical findings are presented that permit further discussion. Outcomes permit post-hoc examination of a recent, collectively described, ‘consensus’ model of PCK, identifying strengths and potential issues. As we will illustrate, the relationship between CK, PK and PCK is central to this; that is, probing the hypothesis of pedagogical content knowledge as an ‘amalgam’ of content and pedagogical knowledge.