From intention to action: Understanding youth electoral participation across countries through civic education

Journal articleResearchPeer reviewed

Publication data


ByMarlen Holtmann, Sabine Meinck, Andrés Sandoval Hernandez, Maria Magdalena Isac
Original languageEnglish
Published inDevelopmental Science, 29(2), Article e70127
Pages15
Editor (Publisher)Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN1363-755X
DOI/Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70127
Publication statusPublished – 03.2026

Declining youth electoral participation threatens the long-term legitimacy of representative democracy. However, timely cross-national indicators of early disengagement remain scarce. This study draws on data from the IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) to examine (a) whether eighth-grade students' stated voting intentions [are associated with] their cohort's eventual electoral participation, and (b) which individual-level factors best explain those intentions after controlling for country-level characteristics. First, we align students' voting intentions from IEA ICCS 2009 and 2016 with [corresponding] official age-specific turnout rates in each cohort's first national election. The analysis reveals a moderate, statistically significant association, indicating that higher proportions of “likely future voters” in Grade 8 are associated with higher turnout once these cohorts reach voting age. Second, to identify the drivers of voting intentions, we pool microdata from all three IEA ICCS cycles (2009, 2016, 2022; N 316,000 students) and estimate fixed-effects models to account for time-invariant national confounders. Results show that students' political interest emerges as the strongest predictor, followed by civic knowledge, self-efficacy, trust in the political system and its institutions, and parental political interest. Student background characteristics (e.g., gender or language at home) lose statistical significance once these factors are accounted for. The findings validate adolescent voting intentions as an early warning indicator and highlight malleable psychological levers (i.e., interest, knowledge, efficacy) that civic-education policy can target.