Diagnostik von ICT Literacy: Messen Multiple-Choice-Aufgaben und simulationsbasierte Aufgaben vergleichbare Konstrukte?: Vergleich der Testergebnisse zweier Instrumente aus den aktuellen Large-Scale-Studien ICILS 2013 und NEPS

Assessment of ICT literacy: Do multiple-choice tasks and simulation-based tasks measure comparable constructs? Comparison of the test results of two large-scale instruments: ICILS 2013 versus NEPS

Journal articleResearchPeer reviewed

Publication data


ByMartin Senkbeil, Jan Marten Ihme
Original languageGerman
Published inDiagnostica, 66(3)
Pages147-157
Editor (Publisher)Hogrefe Verlag
ISSN0012-1924, 2190-622X
DOI/Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000243 (Open Access)
Publication statusPublished – 07.2020

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) literacy suggests a performance-based assessment by means of tasks

presenting simulation-based and interactive computer environments. The present article addresses the question of whether multiplechoice

(MC) tasks measure a comparable (similar) construct to simulation-based tasks. For this purpose, we compared the test results of

two large-scale instruments that were collected from a total of 2,075 students: the MC-based ICT literacy test of Grade 9 in the German

National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and the simulation-based test of the International Computer and Literacy Study (ICILS) 2013. The

analyses support the validity of the construct interpretation of the MC-based test in NEPS. In terms of convergent evidence, the MC-based

tasks correlate substantially with the computer- and simulation-based tasks in ICILS 2013 (.68 ≤ r ≤ .90). Furthermore, moderate positive

and comparably high correlations of the two tests with ICT-related student characteristics (e. g., self-efficacy) underline the construct

interpretation of the NEPS ICT literacy test. Further analyses clearly show that items measuring ICT literacy and items measuring general

cognitive abilities form distinct factors.